AI Speedforce

01Run

Agent engineering studio

AI agents that do real work in the systems you already run

We build task-scoped and multi-step agents that reach your stack through tools and MCP servers, act on real records, and hand off to a person when the decision needs one.

run · support triage run complete
  1. Trigger 0 ms A ticket lands in the support queue, tagged as a refund request.
  2. Plan 310 ms The agent reads the ticket, picks the three tools it needs, and orders the calls.
  3. Tool calls 3 in parallel · 204 ms Reads the order, the product record and the refund policy. No writes yet.
    1. orders.lookuporder #4471128 ms
    2. catalog.searchvariant match204 ms
    3. policy.retrievereturns, 30 day96 ms
  4. Check 88 ms The draft is tested against the refund rules and the eval cases for this task.
  5. Human approval approved Refunds over the threshold you set wait for a person. This one cleared in the queue.
  6. Result 1,180 tokens Refund issued, the order annotated, and the customer answered in your voice.
6 steps · 3 tool calls · 1 human gate
One agent run, trigger to result. An illustration of a run shape, not a client record.

03Trust

Reliability is the whole job

A demo agent works once. A production agent works on the hundredth run, on the input nobody planned for, at a cost you agreed in advance. That gap is where most of our engineering time goes.

Evals

We write the test cases before the agent, from real examples you give us, and run them on every change. A regression shows up in the suite, not in your inbox.

Tracing and observability

Every run records its plan, tool calls, inputs, outputs and cost. When someone asks why the agent did that, the trace answers it.

Guardrails

Write actions are checked against your rules before they execute, and an agent only ever holds the tools its task needs.

Budgets and fallbacks

Cost and latency ceilings are set per task and enforced in the run. When a model or an API is down, the agent degrades to a defined path instead of guessing.

What each agent type touches

Read access is broad, write access is narrow, and every write has a gate until you decide otherwise.

Agent Reads Writes Human gate
Support triage Tickets, orders, policy docs ticket.reply, refund.create Refunds over your threshold
Catalogue enrichment Product records, supplier feeds, images product.update, metafield.set Price and title changes
Order operations Orders, fulfilments, carrier status fulfilment.create, note.add Cancellations, address edits
Lead qualification Form fills, CRM records, call notes contact.tag, pipeline.move Outbound sends
Content operations Briefs, existing pages, brand rules draft.create Anything that publishes

05Terms

What we commit to

Not results we cannot show you yet. These are the conditions we work under, on every engagement.

Evals Every agent ships with an eval suite Written from your real examples, before the agent exists.
Tracing Every run is traced end to end Plan, tools, inputs, outputs and cost, from the first day you use it.
Human gate Write actions wait for a person by default We open that up only where you tell us to.
Budgets Cost and latency ceilings are agreed before we build Enforced inside the run, not reviewed after the invoice.
[PLACEHOLDER] case study

A single engagement told properly: the task we scoped, what the agent touches, the eval cases we agreed, and what changed for the team that runs it. Needs a real client and their sign-off before it goes here.

06Asked

Questions we get asked first

What counts as an agent, as opposed to an automation?

An automation follows a fixed path you wrote. An agent is given a goal and a set of tools, then decides which tools to call and in what order to reach it. We build both, and we say which one a job needs. Plenty of work that gets pitched as an agent is better and cheaper as a scripted workflow.

How do you stop an agent doing something wrong?

Four ways, layered. Scope: an agent only gets the tools it needs. Guardrails: write actions are checked against your rules before they run. Human gates: actions above a threshold you set wait for a person. Evals: we write test cases before the agent and run them on every change, so a regression shows up before it ships.

Can agents work inside our existing stack?

That is the point of the work. Agents reach your systems through tools and MCP servers we build against your APIs, so they read and write real records in Shopify, WordPress, HighLevel or whatever you run. Nothing has to move.

What does an engagement look like?

We start by scoping one task narrowly enough to be measured, agree the eval cases and the cost and latency budget for it, then build to those. You get the traces from day one, so you can see what the agent did and why before you widen its scope.

Do you still build websites and do SEO?

Yes, as supporting work. If an agent needs a front end, a storefront or content that ranks, we build it. It is no longer what we lead with. See web development and SEO.

Tell us the task, not the technology

Describe one job you would hand to a capable new starter. We will tell you whether an agent should do it, what it would touch, and what it would cost to run.

AI Speedforce
Start a project